Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

The view from above

7/12/2014

0 Comments

 
The merits of bottom up thinking and the dangers of thin simplifications
Picture
In Wednesday’s Guardian there was a piece about the life story of Clyde Haynes. Amongst many details, it mentioned troubled early years, time served in prison, a successful pursuit of an economics degree on release, and his position now as a long-standing school principal. 

Remarking on his life’s journey, Mr Haynes pointed out his path to success was not solely down to his own choices or the top-down advice of experts in rehabilitation; rather, it emerged from the support of friends, church ministers, the establishment of a prison school, and the general welfare system that existed locally. 

It was a long list of factors and experience, most of which would be hard to describe as planned. They emerged from the practical realities of the situations he found himself in.

Mr Haynes’ story is worth dwelling on for many reasons but one in particular might be described as, “the trouble with the view from above.” Put most simply, we live in a society where the State puts too much emphasis on experts and top-down, technical prescriptions to our social and cultural problems, while local, practical knowledge, a reservoir of solutions, is left untapped, as though life can be planned uniformly for all.

So, for example, in our fight with crime, we ignore the diverse contexts and environments of our communities and the bottom-up perspectives from locals in those communities, and instead rely on drafting in foreign experts, with some general solutions and universal knowledge about crime.

In our schools, the Minister of Education is wedded to a one-size-fits-all format, turning all our students into the same generic, faceless student, studying the same generic syllabus. We ignore local teachers on the ground and their prescriptions for the schools they work in and know best.

Essentially this is an argument about technical knowledge (techne, or “hard and fast rules”) versus practical knowledge (metis, or improvisation and common sense), and how behind state thinking, engineering, and planning, the techne replaced the metis for purposes of statecraft like governing and taking stock. Yet we don’t recognise the consequences of this monoculturalism and simplistic thinking for a world of complexity and difference.

There are many examples from everyday life that demonstrate where top-down, generalistic thinking fails and bottom-up practical knowledge is required. For example, when large ships are on the open ocean they require a captain with a solid general and technical knowledge of navigation, but when they come into dock, they always call out a local pilot with his everyday, local knowledge of the harbour to bring it into berth.

Or the anecdote told by political anthropologist James C Scott of his fieldwork in a village in Malaysia at whose centre was a cherished mango tree. Unfortunately, over time, the tree came under attack from large red ants which ate all the fruit. So the locals called the government, who sent their expert. His technical knowledge suggested  to avoid possible further contamination the tree should be cut down.

Around the same time, an older member of the village had been pottering around the base of the tree for some weeks. When Scott asked him what he was up to, the villager explained he knew the black ants on the other side of the village were the enemies of red ants. He said he knew the black ants bred in the dried nipah palms so he had collected some and placed them in strategic places for the black ants to multiply. 

After a few weeks he had an abundance of black ants and moved them to the base of the tree. Over the next few days the ants battled. 

At the end the red ants had vanished from the tree, and the black ants—uninterested in mangoes still on a tree—moved away too. The villagers’ favourite tree had been saved and not chopped down. The practical knowledge of the local environment possessed by the gentleman provided a solution to possible contamination and loss the technical and universal knowledge did not. The story is a metaphor for our own social environments.

Now this is not a suggestion to do away with techne, what Scott describes as “thin simplifications”; of course techne has value. Rather it is the argument that our leaders and the State deprive themselves of valuable forms of knowledge to make our society better. By being blindsided by top-down uniform solutions, they ignore bottom-up local ones. 

By governing through simplifications, through the generic and the uniform, the State does us all a disservice. Modern social engineering erases the wonders of human difference and instead produces bureaucratic homogeneity and market-driven standardisation. This Scott calls the problem of “seeing like State.”

http://m.guardian.co.tt/columnist/2014-12-07/view-above
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed