Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

The Happiness Scam

15/3/2015

0 Comments

 
The happiness industry, positive psychology and dead-end jobs. How happiness became a scam to hide social inequality and a global economy on a road to destruction
Picture
Whether it’s the UN ranking nations in terms of a global happiness index, our National Gas Company’s ad campaign asking “are you the happiest?” or a massive brand like Coca-Cola claiming they sell happiness in a can rather than sugar water—corporate and State use of happiness has become a major aspect of our everyday lives. To support this recent push by private industry and governments to measure, manipulate and promote happiness, a new social science called ‘positive psychology’ emerged at the turn of the century. 

This was because back in the early 1990s economists in the Global North began to recognise on a large scale that workers in their nations were increasingly suffering from depression at work. This was clear in the large increases of workers taking time off, being absent or quitting, and citing mental and behavioural illnesses as the reason. 

Economists, governments, and private enterprise were greatly concerned. So they came together to fund and promote a new alliance between psychologists and economic policymakers to tackle this increasing depression-driven drag on corporate profit (alongside the antidepressant industry, too). According to its State and academic originators, the supposed purpose of positive psychology is to make people happy using the most up-to-date methods of “scientific” understanding. 

Great claims were made by this new social science such as, in the power of positive thought negative emotions can be overcome and as such anyone can achieve personal happiness. Of course, the hard data does not support that, and most people might implicitly realise happiness is much more than a positive mental attitude, something you buy or an individualist project. 

Yet, no matter the lack of supporting evidence, a massive and successful corporate field dedicated to promoting personal happiness emerged to re-write how we understand it. 

This success is easy to see in the emergence of positive psychology as popular culture—think endless TED talks on the happiness manifesto, companies employing a chief happiness officer, and constant ad campaigns centred on happiness. On cable TV, in our local programing, and overflowing off the bookshelves, the happiness industry—and its constant desire for product diversification—has exploded and is making private enterprise a lot of money.

If we look at the claims of this industry about the production of happiness—such as the idea happiness results from the cognitive outlooks of individuals—we glimpse the cultural logic of our modern times. Much like the ethos of the modern corporation the quest for happiness is today driven by profit imperatives, not social justice.

While the economies of most nations suffer from some combination of dead-end jobs, austerity, inequality, debt, insecurity, poverty and decline, advertisers and health professionals bombard us with daily messages to effortlessly enjoy, create and be amazing by relying on our personal dynamism, enthusiasm and optimism. But what happens to the majority of people that cannot do that? Or people with dead-end jobs? What about their happiness?

In labour terms they become a depressed and mentally withdrawn worker. And under neoliberalism the disengaged worker must be overcome because they harm profits and offer little potential. Or put another way, happy workers are valued higher in terms of costs and benefits to a company than unhappy workers.

On an implicit level this marriage between the self-production of happiness and the ideas of neoclassical economists transform the basic understandings of our personal emotions. Atomistic individualism with its stress and desire for personal choice and responsibility, self-resilience, success, money-making, getting the upper hand at work and much more, now remake happiness from a social matter into an emotionally individualist moment. 

According to the academic researcher Sam Binkley happiness today “is more than ever tied to economic freedom and the inclination to act in one’s own self interest.” Another way to say this is that money or entrepreneurship buys happiness. But the world is not equal for all. Not all vocations are valued. Nor do all jobs provide sufficient dignity, purpose or money. 

And while some can buy whatever they want, to understand happiness as competitive—as economic and status driven—is to privatise happiness and make it a personal enterprise; no longer a social good connected to the development of empathy, compassion, and social connection.

As such, we might caution that the happiness industry is socially destructive and based on a worldview that suit employers, business and profits. Its genesis was to make workers less depressed, which includes making people more likely to stick it out at their dead-end jobs. Rather than calling it the happiness industry, we might call it instead the unhappiness is bad for profits industry.

http://m.guardian.co.tt/columnist/2015-03-15/happiness-industry

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed