Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

Sexuality and the State

13/5/2013

0 Comments

 
How State law is a mechanism of difference making
Picture
One of the key tasks of anthropology is to make visible how power mechanisms like state practices, such as legislation and language, fix and construct what populations come to see and understand as “natural.” This sense of naturalness is often tied to a nation’s history and culture. And a state often uses criminal law to police and punish deviations from the dominant ideas of morality and religion that exist in any society. 

In the case of sexuality, criminal law in T&T has been and is currently deployed to determine what is “normal” sexual behaviour—heterosexuality—and what is “deviant” sexual behaviour—homosexuality, or more correctly same-sex desire. Far more punitively than the cultural codes of morality and religion, the law labels, stereotypes and polices particular sexual identities as unnatural. This construction of our social reality by the State makes invisible certain facts about the history of sex and sexuality.

For example, sexuality studies has shown the actual categories of “heterosexuality” and “homosexuality” do not exist in nature or in ancient sources, and were invented by western society in the mid-19th century. The scientific reality is that all consenting human beings desire and can engage in a wide variety of sexual behaviour. Put most bluntly, we are all bodies with physical functions and desires.

It is culture and the law, among other things, that police our understandings of which of these functions and desires are somehow more “natural” and acceptable than others. In a 1994 article called Not Just (Any) Body Can Be A Citizen, Jacqui Alexander pointed out that T&T and some other nation states use the law to make sexual inscriptions on all our bodies.

A national through birth, she was not an equal citizen because, since she identified as a lesbian, the justice system labelled her a criminal, an outlaw in her own country. Such outlawing is achieved in many ways, the most blatant is through legislative gestures such as criminalising forms of non-procreative sex. In this way, the State can police people’s intimate behaviours and criminalise consensual acts between adults in private.

This raises the question: should the State even be allowed into the bedrooms of consenting adults? Section 13 of the Sexual Offences Act, written in 1986 and amended in 1994 and 2000, is an obvious example of this state over-reach. It outlaws, criminalises and makes punishable by imprisonment of 25 years, private sexual acts between consenting male adults. It also criminalises anal sex between consenting male and female adults. 

Another more subtle law is Article 8 (18/1) of the Immigration Act, which states “homosexual” men and women are not allowed to enter the country, as if they aren’t equally men and women. Successive governments have also reinforced these laws by passing strong verbal criticisms of any organisation or person who supports the repeal of laws criminalising consensual gay relations. For example, in 2000 the then Attorney General suggested that the existence of such a law was not a human rights issue.

Simply put, criminalisation is a technique of power owned by the State. In T&T and elsewhere, it is used to imagine a nation and reconstruct a self, so that citizens are specifically heterosexual, or at least view heterosexuality as “natural.” Another justice system technique connected to sexuality and used by the State is discriminatory policing, involving the selective enforcement of certain laws to target members of the gay community. 

Connected to this discrimination is the way police officers routinely fail to take seriously, to make reports on and to investigate crimes reported by the LGBT community, including allegations of homophobic attacks. Another discriminatory practice is the exemption clauses of legislation like the one contained in the 1999 Equal Opportunities Bill. Designed to legally enforce the right to non-discrimination, the bill contains a clause designed to exclude non-heterosexual individuals from its protections.

For example, according to the act, kissing or holding hands in public between members of the same sex can be deemed offensive behaviour toward other groups and people in society. We don’t individually criminalise sexuality; the State does. And the State is always a collection of actors with particular historical interests. 

We think we make up our own minds about who is allowed equal citizenship in society but law and morality discipline us too, meaning that the State naturalises inequality between citizens, ensuring some humans have more rights and respect than others.

http://www.guardian.co.tt/columnist/2013-05-06/sexuality-and-state
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed