Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

Scotland and Tobago

14/9/2014

0 Comments

 
Scotland's vote for Independence and its implications for Tobago
Picture
On Thursday, Scotland goes to the polls in a referendum on Independence from the United Kingdom. At the time of writing projections suggest the Yes campaign has a slender lead and secession is possible from the state Scotland has been part of since 1707.

This has leaders of the main three political parties in the UK – Conservative, Labour and the Liberal Democrats – in a panic. So much so that leaders of all three spent last week campaigning in Scotland against a Yes vote and promising many things they should have offered years, if not decades ago.

On this side of the Atlantic, today is also the date of a self-governance forum in Signal Hill, Tobago. So far Chief Secretary of the Tobago House of Assembly, Orville London, has been clear he is not after secession like the Scots but self-determination. The desire for extra powers of self-determination however is the same road the Scottish Yes campaign started off on long ago.

Now of course Tobago is not Scotland, and Trinidad and Tobago is not the United Kingdom. The differences are vast. Yet as the possible disintegration of one of the world’s most successful Unions comes into view should we be concerned about the future cohesion of our own twin-island nation-state?

For Mr London the forum is an opportunity to find out what Tobagonians want. As he put it, “The self-governance of which we speak has nothing to do with secession. Nowhere did we get any concerted response from Tobagonians advocating secession. What we are talking about is that the sovereign democratic state of Trinidad and Tobago must remain united. But in that sovereign state the people of Tobago must have the right for self-determination.”

In the political sociology literature the claim of cultural and ethnic uniqueness is often the catalyst in demands for separatist movements. To a certain degree, it is possible to describe some differences between Tobago and Trinidad in this cultural way.

There are distinctions in family and kinship, race and ethnicity, language and worldview. We might also observe, in the main, the day-to-day lives of Tobagonians are less urban and more rural. Some researchers also stress Tobagonians maintain elements of ancestral African culture like the belief in collectivism, which is distinct to the culture of Port of Spain’s capitalism, and the harsh individualism it breeds.

Yet looking on from the outside Tobago, and also with Scotland for that matter, it doesn’t seem either is so culturally unique from the rest of their societies to be foreign.

Another reason behind movements for political autonomy and self-determination is geography. In the cases of Scotland and Tobago we might say both are geographically distinct and apart from the seat of political decision-making. As a result of this distance from their national centres of power both suffered historical inequalities such as economic mistreatment, uneven development, and discrimination.

In Scotland’s case many UK commentators point out Scottish Independence is the logical outcome of Thatcherism, which was premised on rugged individualism over social justice and caused much social damage north (and south) of the border. For these commentators the Scottish Yes campaign is winning because they are offering a vision of the future with a social conscience none of the main political parties in Westminster has offered since the 1970s. A similar sentiment Mr London might consider.

So looking to the future what might self-determination for Tobago involve? There are many political devices available to achieve self-determination, including many that fall short of independent statehood including autonomy, federalism, power sharing, devolution and decentralisation.

Decentralisation allows for internal autonomy within a nation-state. It allows for some decision-making powers to be taken away from the national state and placed in a sub-state. Some suggest it is the best way to appease any desire for secession because it provides a limited sense of autonomy with the accompanying political pride this promotes. The power at the centre loses a little, while the power in the sub-state gains. Government loses while governance wins.

Of course such decentralisation isn’t necessarily rosy. It can bring problems at the same time it appears to be solving them. For example, in an extreme case discrimination against a minority in the self-determining region might occur or one religious group’s rights are protected more than another group’s?

The terrain of self-determination is both inspiring yet contains dangerous unknowns. Yet a population’s request to be treated as the masters of their own geographical space should be listened to. However, as Gordon Brown remarked about the increasing likelihood of Scotland secession, “countries can be lost by mistake.” A warning we should not dismiss lightly.

Dr Dylan Kerrigan is an anthropologist with a Scottish Dad

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed