Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

Privilege, Empathy And Politics

18/1/2015

0 Comments

 
According to anthropologist Barbara King, one alternative to the 2014 Merriam-Webster Dictionary word of the year “culture” is “privilege.” For the political anthropologist, Prof King’s selection is a good one because of the way systematic bias for some groups over others burst into mainstream conversation in 2014
Picture
According to anthropologist Barbara King, one alternative to the 2014 Merriam-Webster Dictionary word of the year “culture” is “privilege.” For the political anthropologist, Prof King’s selection is a good one because of the way systematic bias for some groups over others burst into mainstream conversation in 2014. For example, events in the US provided abundant evidence of how justice systems disproportionately treat certain groups over others.

While in the Middle East, the Israeli state regularly broke international laws in 2014, yet was exempted from sanction in ways other nations would not be. And more recently in the coverage and condemnation of the appalling events in Paris but relative media silence of the massacre in Baga, Nigeria. Privilege isn’t just about biased nations, media, and justice systems, it is also about individuals.

Many born into the middle class or above, or who are light skinned or male or heterosexual or able-bodied or English-speaking or hold a high-level job or can include a combination of some of these and more, have a distinct level of often invisible privileges. Of course, everyone’s life stories are unique and stories of privilege or a lack of it will vary amongst us all.

In sociology we call the way different elements of our identity bring privilege or deny it at the same time, “intersectionality.” Yes #alllivesmatter. But no, all lives are not privileged or understood to matter equally. Another issue with privilege is the way it can negatively impact empathy. Empathy is the ability to put yourself in someone else’ shoes, and imagine how things feel and look from another person’s position.

A good way it can be nurtured is through reading and the arts where we are given a glimpse into the minds of other people. Another way is through the acceptance and study of cultural differences. Where empathy is lacking people and the society they live in often become self-interested, homogeneous and dehumanising for some groups. It is the world of “me first” and shunning groups as “other” into an innately lower category.

It breeds a continuum of anti-social behaviours that begin with the mundane, like being impolite or rude, and reach on the other extreme—by way of stereotype, stigma and prejudice—murder and genocide. In the literature empathy is understood as inter-species. Many animals, like elephants and rats, display it and of course, dolphins too. In humans empathy is something observed in toddlers and infants.

For most children research suggests environmental factors develop or curtail this innate capacity for empathy. A healthy self-esteem is suggested as a central component in a growing child’s ability to recognise and respond to other people’s feelings and needs. While environments that are stressful, lack attachment to others, and (are) unsafe seem to dampen children’s empathetic abilities.

That said, amongst some humans like the autistic, those with schizophrenia, and rich people, a diminished ability for empathy is often noted. In the last instance, this is something many also suggest anecdotally— money changes people. Recent research out of Berkeley supports the anecdote and points out people who drive expensive cars are more likely to cut in front of other drivers than those driving cheap cars.

Drivers in expensive cars are also more likely to ignore pedestrians on crosswalks and to double-park. Another experiment showed the richer the person, the more they ignore the rules. While in another, researchers set up a game designed to provide one player with all the cash prizes and noted as the player got richer he was more likely to cheat. And there are a lot more studies like these.

One interpretation of these data by UCLA social neuroscientist, Keely Muscatell suggests rich people lack empathy because wealth affects neural processes related to understanding others. A possible take away from these studies is the suggestion rich people make bad politicians. Their high-income status and privilege means they lack the empathy and understanding needed to lead and develop nations where the rich are a minority and the not so rich the majority.

This is essentially the same refreshing point made about politics by the former president of Uruguay, José Mujica. “I’m not against people who have money, who like money, who go crazy for money…But in politics we have to separate them. We have to run people who love money too much out of politics, they’re a danger in politics…People who love money should dedicate themselves to industry, to commerce, to multiply wealth. But politics is the struggle for the happiness of all.”


http://m.guardian.co.tt/columnist/2015-01-18/privilege-empathy-and-politics
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed