Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
  • Books
    • Therapeutic Cultures
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Presentations
  • Other Writings
  • Videos
  • In the Press
  • Blog
  • Research
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future

Jesus or St Francis of Assisi?

15/10/2012

0 Comments

 
_The political sociology of what types of people become politicians and why?
Picture
Why do people get into professional politics? One answer is power and the ability to influence who gets what, when, and where from the State, in so doing maybe changing or reinforcing the status quo a little. The sociologist Max Weber suggested there were two ways to make politics one’s vocation. “Either one lives ‘for’ politics or one lives ‘off’ politics.” You have a calling to fight for a cause or you support yourself financially from the profession.

Of course those reasons are not exclusive nor all there is to it. And obviously many modern politicians would state that they do both—living for, and from, politics at the same time. Ethically, what might be best for the masses are politicians who live only “for” politics. Why? Well, by having people in politics who don’t worry about what they can take from it and only think about what they can do to improve society, we are all best served.

In modern democratic systems only those who are really wealthy are supposedly in a position to enter politics immune to personal pressures of economic vulnerability affecting their decision-making and susceptibility to bribes and the like.

The irony of this hierarchy of political morality reveals social consequences. If the professional politician’s job is best suited to someone who is not influenced by their day-to-day financial situation, then it follows professional politicians should be independently wealthy.

Yet do independently wealthy and propertied politicians reflect the social and economic realities of the less well off? No. This is because the group interests of those with independent wealth generally align with the interests of those with money and property.

CLICO and HCU are two examples of professional politicians supporting the status quo over the greater good and leaves the question: is it the propertyless or the property owner who is best suited morally to improving social order? The previous profession of a politician is also significant in who becomes a professional politician.

One reason so many lawyers become politicians isn’t a takeover of politics to enact greater billing powers; rather it is a reflection of social realities. For example, it is rare for an entrepreneur or businessperson in their prime to become a politician. Such people are mostly irreplaceable in the context of their enterprise or business, just as many scientists are indispensable to their research projects and aren’t generally found as professional politicians either.

Lawyers, on the other hand, are over-represented as politicians. One reason is that on the whole, lawyers can make the career change. Also, historically, lawyers’ professional interests and training have grown alongside the development of modern politics and the division of labour. Of course, the field of law has produced many great heroes and fighters for social change.

Nonetheless, on the whole law—like the civil service—is the bureaucratic administration of political domination. Someone has to do the paperwork of government and provide legality, or the whole system of “who gets, what, when, and where” falls into violence.

In this light, that Ferguson and Galbaransingh might get off because of a Section 34 blunder, and hundreds of  young black men were incarcerated during the SOE without due process become two sides of the same coin.

They demonstrate what happens when class interests, politics and the law meet—as they do in government. The rich can get off on legal technicalities, while the poor have their rights taken away completely. It highlights the way politics works in the interests of certain groups over others.

So what is to be done? For Weber the point was: the type of politicians we have determines the type of social world we have. In this sense politics needs morality put into it rather than a “morality all of its own.” Unfortunately the only people Weber suggested as moral examples for professional politicians were Jesus and St Francis of Assisi.

And that was his point. The social world and the political world feed into each other. The social background of our politicians, the characteristics of the professions they come from, and their class interests all shape the world they make and we have to live in.

Simply put, if we don’t put the right mix of ingredients into the political system we won’t get the social changes we want and need out of it.

http://guardian.co.tt/columnist/2012-10-15/jesus-or-st-francis-assisi
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed