Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

Imagined communities and the national census

25/2/2013

0 Comments

 
What does the recent census tell us about Trinidad and Tobago
Picture
According to the political historian Benedict Anderson the nation is an “imagined community.” An idea. It is imagined because most of its members and citizens will never meet each other, but yet each member has an idea that fellow members are out there.

How is the nation imagined? Well there are various mechanisms and devices that help us imagine the boundaries of this imagined community. These include our passports, the national anthem, local monetary notes and coinage, our flag, national museums, and maps, amongst other things. Other devices are more banal and include a local dialect like non-Standard English, buying a local national newspaper, local forms of knowledge, and tuning in every morning and evening to the national TV news.

For Anderson such devices help us imagine ourselves as part of a larger community of similar individuals. He goes on to say this imagined community creates horizontal feelings of deep comradeship and brotherhood, which are at the heart of nationalist politics.

Another device that helps citizens imagine themselves as part of a nation is a national census.  It’s use and choice of identity categories creates a particular vision of social reality. Our most recent census undertaken in 2011 was released last week and it provides a good example of how a census shapes the national imagination.

According to the census T&T is divided ethnically into 11 different groups as follows. East Indian (35.43%), African (34.22%), Mixed-other (15.16%), Mixed – African and East Indian (7.66%), Not stated (6.22%), Caucasian (0.59%), Chinese (0.30%), other ethnic group (0.17%), Indigenous (0.11%) Syrian/Lebanese (0.08), and Portuguese (0.06%).

There is no mention on the census of the local ethnic labels and markers heard during the course of an average day. Cultural categories (some more politically correct than others) like – redman, darkie, chinee, creole, potogee, chindian, hakwai, chigro, Spanish, cocoa-panyol, ras, dougla and many others. These labels aren’t on the census because they are folk categories and local forms of knowledge. A national census is a different kind of beast. It is an exercise in political calculation and national stocktaking for the modern age. It isn’t interested in folk knowledge.

Such stocktaking is an overt form of state power. A modern state needs to categorise its populations to make a society governable, it is a central element of statecraft; it defines who has rights and who can get resources from the state.

Of course, that the formulation of census questions and categories is a political exercise is not a startling revelation. The cultural categories on our census may have been tweaked slightly over the years but the initial choice of categories stretch back to the days of colonial administration.

For some categories like age this is not a problem, but for other categories like cultural groups a census takes for granted the existence of the category itself. As such, it shapes how we come to imagine each other. It makes social facts out of political categories.

In its most basic terms a census reduces us all to one pre-determined cultural category that we share identically with everyone else in the category. These predetermined choices cause persons to think of the nation as composed of members of various groups. These groups are supposedly timeless, primordial and bounded. Census categories deny that everyday life is far more situational and that persons can constantly negotiate their various social links by choosing to activate various forms of cultural capital depending on the situation and person. This might include adopting a particular accent and cultural behaviour in order to deal with a particular social situation as takes place everyday in T&T.

As the cultural critic Arjun Appadurai once pointed out: “Statistics are to bodies and social types what maps are to territories: they flatten and enclose.”

So a census seems inert. Harmless. Scientific. Yet, a census is a lot more than statistics about the nation. It connects the past to the present through its choice of cultural categories. It makes certain groups invisible such as those of Amerindian heritage who only recently were included as a category. It shapes how we imagine ourselves – as members of bounded cultural categories rather than persons who’s cultural knowledge of each other is far greater and shared than in most other nations.

Understood in this light a census becomes more than simply interesting, it is a manifestation of bureaucratic power that plays a key role in the construction of reality and how we as citizens come to imagine our national community. It shapes us more than we shape it.

http://guardian.co.tt/columnist/2013-02-25/imagined-communities-and-national-census
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed