Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
  • Books
    • Therapeutic Cultures
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Presentations
  • Other Writings
  • Videos
  • In the Press
  • Blog
  • Research
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future

Gifts and Bribes

15/9/2013

0 Comments

 
In a recent Op-Ed in the Washington Post, an anthropologist asked, “What is the difference between a gift and a bribe?”
Picture
In contrast to the way the legal profession implicates a gift as a bribe, anthropologists don’t focus on whether or not a gift-giver clearly states there is a “quid pro quo” to any gift exchange. For the anthropologist gift-exchange is more nuanced.

The Gift, written in 1925 by French sociologist Marcel Mauss is the most famous book on gift exchange. Mauss’s central point was that regardless of intent, in the act of gift giving a reciprocal social bond is formed. As such gift giving can create and reinforce social relationships, including hierarchies.

This is not because one gives a gift expecting for it to be reciprocated; in many cases that would spoil the act. Rather it’s because gift-exchange is one element in how humans forge social bonds and networks. For social ties or friendships to be nurtured and maintained they imply reciprocity, whether it’s a gift, favour, hard work, time, loyalty, or something else.

For example, amongst equals if you buy a person a drink, most often they will buy you one back, if not that same night, perhaps another. Give someone a birthday present, and while you wouldn’t in most situations (unless you’re my sister) provide a list of what you want in return, you will most likely get a birthday present, some time. Do someone a favour and they can “owe you one”. It’s often the same with letter writing, emails and phones calls; you give, you receive.

But what happens when gift exchange occurs between persons who aren’t friends or family. What happens when persons with different levels of power within the social structure are involved in gift-exchange?

For birthdays and Christmas many parents and adults give gifts to children of a financial value the children obviously can’t reciprocate. Adults understand this, but it does not mean that those gifts aren’t given almost like a sacrifice, in wishful expectation perhaps that in return kids will be well behaved, loving and loyal – whether it does or doesn’t turn out that way.

Around the home some give the odd job man a Christmas gift not expecting a gift in return but the ambiguity can imply continued hard work and loyalty as repayment. And do some old, rich men give young attractive women expensive gifts and luxuries? Are they expecting repayment in kind or is another form implied?

In anthropology these sorts of gift exchanges, where one is made subordinate, are described as the “poison in the gift”. And this gets to the heart of the difference between a gift and a bribe.

In the WaPo piece the discussion concerned a Governor, Robert F. McDonnell who investigative reporting revealed had accepted gifts for himself or family members that included “a $6,500 Rolex watch, a $10,000 engagement gift, $15,000 in wedding catering and a $15,000 Bergdorf Goodman shopping spree, not to mention $120,000 in loans” from the chief executive of a particular company.

For the legal teams the main issue was: were the gifts bribes or were they just gifts? Lawyers want to know whether on receiving these gifts, was it clearly articulated to the Governor that something was expected in return.

Yet anthropological research into human behaviour suggests it isn’t just words that can turn a gift into a bribe. A lack of equity in power – particularly economic power in Western society – does this too.

For example if a local Prime Minister accepted the financial gift of fees for their children’s education, they and their lawyers might naively assume that it was just a gift. But if the personal wealth of the PM couldn’t reciprocate such financial generosity, the anthropologist might suggest the PM had immediately become the subordinate in the relationship.

For Mauss gift giving is mostly premised on the idea of reciprocity. If gifts are given between equals reciprocity can be straightforward. Yet if the gift giving takes place between persons who are unequal, then just like the child or odd-job man scenario, while repayment might not really be expected the ambiguity can mean reciprocity of some sort is still implied.

And this is the crux. When a politician accepts gifts they cannot financially afford for themselves and hence reciprocate, often the only way for them to return such generosity is through the power of their office or political contacts. Gifts then, can become bribes without needing the legal benchmark of a verbal confirmation. And everyone implicitly knows it.

http://guardian.co.tt/columnist/2013-09-15/gifts-and-bribes
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed