Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

Equality of opportunity?

1/10/2012

0 Comments

 
_Gender stereotypes and the denial of equality of opportunity.
Picture
One quality we all share as humans is we are all different from each other. These differences shape us as individuals and as members of groups. The anthropologist Ruth Benedict once remarked, “the purpose of anthropology is to make the world safe for human differences.” How we go about doing that is not a simple task. One step is to ensure that people aren't excluded from equality of opportunity—such as in employment—based on arbitrary cultural and personal differences.

Cultural differences are part of our expressive behaviour and identity. They include a person’s ethnicity, their gender, religion and much else. Many nations have laws to try and ensure employment discrimination based on difference doesn’t occur. Yet as some can attest, hiring and firing is often based on subjective decision-making and perceived stereotypes about a person's abilities.

At this year’s Matriculation ceremony at UWI, St Augustine Campus, there was an interesting visual contrast. In the front row, sat ahead of the new first year undergrads, were the top performers at this year’s Secondary Entrance Assessment (SEA). Understandably they looked nervous as they waited to be honoured. On the main stage were senior UWI officials, there to welcome the incoming undergraduate class of 2015, as well as offer congrats to the SEA’s stars.

The contrast wasn't between those looking nervous and the more composed regulars at such ceremonies. Rather it was about gender. Of the SEA students sat in the front row 12 were girls and one boy. Of the 13 senior members of the UWI Administrative and Academic staff on stage ten were men and three women.

The visual contrast is anecdotal. Yet when thinking about equality of opportunity based on gender it does prompt the thought—why if girls are massively outperforming boys at age 11 are there not more women represented on stage amongst the top tier of UWI officials?

It is impossible to answer that question conclusively. The variables are too many. Some claim a gender bias exists in society. A structural impediment like the proverbial glass ceiling that prevents one group from reaching the top. Others suggest perhaps women make life choices that aren't conducive to senior positions.

Another way to look at the problem has been to view it from the perspective of male underachievement in education. A reality often blamed on poor-parenting and school-teaching experiences that produce an anti-education male identity. However, in the context of equality of opportunity that view fails to account for the dominance of men in leadership positions in later life.

As any good researcher will tell you pinpointing why is always hard because correlation does not mean causality. Real life is messy. But here is a takeaway worth considering. A recent study was conducted into gender bias in hiring for academic jobs in the hard sciences.

It was a randomised controlled experiment where faculty members—both men and women—were given identical job application packages and asked to evaluate a candidate. The only difference was that half the faculty members were given applications with a man’s name and the other half were given the same application but with a woman’s name.

Across the board the “female” applicants were deemed to be less competent, less employable and less suitable to be mentored. They were also offered a lower starting salary. What was most revealing was that the gender bias wasn’t just on the part of men. It was equally coming from faculty members who were women too.

This suggests we aren’t talking about blatant sexism here but more subtle biases. These biases seem to have been absorbed and are reproduced by women themselves. One way to describe this is to say patriarchy is commonsensical and women can be involved in its maintenance and reproduction.

Perhaps in trying to adapt and survive in the “man’s world” of the hard sciences some have absorbed cultural stereotypes and myths about women. These stereotypes and myths reinforce each other and become a factor in the exclusion of suitably qualified women from having true equality of opportunity in pursuing particular jobs.

Put most simply this means that in our everyday lives many of us might be reinforcing through subtle, implicit, assumptions about each other, the exclusion of one group over another. And that’s one way power works. It is subconscious. We can all get caught unawares, reproducing societal stereotypes about competency that reinforce a system built to deny certain people true equality of opportunity.

http://guardian.co.tt/columnist/2012-10-01/equality-opportunity
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed