Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

Cultural Relativism

15/7/2013

0 Comments

 
Whoever we are, and whatever we write or think, our worldview is always a reflection of where each of us has personally come from and the experiences we’ve been through
Picture
Now it is obvious to say that whoever we are, and whatever we write or think, our worldview is always a reflection of where each of us has personally come from and the experiences we’ve been through. In anthropology, to counter this universal human tendency toward ethnocentrism (being biased toward your own culture) we use “reflexivity.” Ideally, reflexivity counters the sway of each person’s own biases. Yet even when trained for such self-awareness, bias is impossible to completely overcome.

When anthropologists go to a foreign culture or community to describe and document groups and their culture, they try to apply reflexivity to what they record. This is because a reflexive-turn can catch and caution the application of foreign cultural ideals to local cultures. A good example of what I mean happened recently in Charlotteville where I’m documenting local reactions to the THA’s development plans for the beachfront, which includes building a mall (without the required EMA approvals) across it. 

Driving along the north coast of Tobago from Plymouth to Charlotteville, hugging the Windward Road as it curves regularly to reveal idyllic, tropical views of Castara, Parlatuvier, Bloody Bay, Man of War Bay, and then down into Charlotteville from L’Anse Fourmi, I couldn’t seriously imagine many people wanting to transform such ecological tranquillity with a beachfront mall.

A rude awakening awaited me on the ground in Charlotteville. Yes of course there are many voices against the development, but the many voices in favour of it caught me off guard. 

Now as much as possible, people and their worldviews should be understood within the cultural context from which they emerge. My own resistance to putting malls on beaches is maybe quite understandable to many. Yet the views of many in Charlotteville in favour of a mall on the beach also have to be understood too—without a researcher’s own morality affecting their narrative.

Of course when the dust settles there is a wide spectrum of different reasons for and against urban development in the ecologically sensitive area and traditionally quiet fishing village that is Charlotteville. 

Two of the narratives some locals mobilise to support their own points of view are that those in favour of the mall have taken government bribes and those against the mall are drug dealers. Both narratives might make sense in individual cases, but it’s hard to believe these rumours make sense when applied to a whole community. Rather, they obscure rational debate, polarise the issue, and divide the community. One wonders who benefits from such division?

When recording accounts of groups and their culture(s), reflexivity can enhance objectivity. And while it’s certainly true within anthropology total objectivity is impossible; how can it ever be when the data instrument is a human being? Reflexivity can function as a fairly useful check and balance to the subtleties of cultural imperialism and/or ethnocentrism.

This brings us back to last’s week’s column on poverty, where in the finest traditions of ethnocentrism, a small part of my patriarchal, European up-bringing, made a blasé assumption about ideal family types in the Caribbean. In listing some of the realities of poverty I included the notion of the “broken home.” My intention was to lament the lack of male figures and support. Yet the point came over to some as an implication the nuclear family—that stalwart of European society—is the only successful family type. 

Clearly, research in the Caribbean has shown in detail how assumptions about an ideal family type are misleading. There are many examples of successful non-nuclear models—the extended and the matrifocal family are two obvious ones.

And as one comment reminded me: “What is a broken home... It is taken to mean a family that is not the nuclear model except the non-nuclear model has been the Caribbean cultural norm. We impose the nuclear model on our societies and then measure how far we are from it and talk of broken homes.

See numerous articles on Caribbean family forms by Merle Hodge and research that says more than 40 per cent of Caribbean families are and have been female-headed. This is OUR norm and we should measure ourselves by our reality.”

In sum reflexivity might not sound too exciting. Yet it’s the subtle, almost missed statements about norms, such as one type of family is the best type of family or malls are a sign of development, which when tallied up with all the foreign content we consume everyday, contribute to the denigration of local culture on our terms for the veneration of foreign cultural norms.

http://guardian.co.tt/columnist/2013-07-15/cultural-relativism
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed