Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

Always outnumbered, always outgunned

25/5/2014

0 Comments

 
What is militarism and why it endangers the future...
Picture
Militarism is the idea that a state and its government should invest in, maintain and deploy a strong military capability. In the June 2014 issue of American Public Health, many leading academics and scientists come together to identify this ideology as a threat to public health.

As a solution to social problems they say the pre-eminence of militaristic ethics and methods in governance makes war, and the drive to war, increasingly normal. This in turn exacerbates a public health crisis because militarism encourages a world where wars and state violence are frequent.

Wars, whether between states or state-driven against its citizens, of course have greatest impact on innocent civilians. In statistical terms ten civilians die in war for every soldier killed. Other consequences include civilian displacement, insecurity, social division, diminished living conditions, psychosocial and physical consequences, and extreme levels of stress.

Responsible in 2011 for 41% of the world’s total military spending, the USA is a clear-cut example of a state doctrine of militarism and how the ideas of the professional military class can come to direct the administration of government policy and the development of various governing institutions. Both there and here, militarism shapes the culture, politics, and economics of civilian life.

To support their argument the authors of the article recruit numerous studies to show that “militarism is positively correlated with conservatism, nationalism, religiosity, patriotism, and with an authoritarian personality, and negatively related to respect for civil liberties, tolerance of dissent, democratic principles, sympathy and welfare toward the troubled and poor, and foreign aid for poorer nations. Militarism subordinates other societal interests, including health, to the interests of the military.”

Mostly this happens subtly. The human, social and taxpayer costs of militarism are made invisible because militarism is the new normal and embedded in 21st century everyday life. This is most obvious in how oblivious many US citizens are to the negative image of its military held by most of the world, the absurd GDP sums diverted to military spending, and how the military’s warrior culture is increasingly above critique.

Which brings us neatly to our own Super Soldier, National Security Minister, Captain Gary Griffith who according to “sources,” has placed an order – on Cabinet’s behalf – for the purchase of 20 armoured SUVs and 15 armoured personnel carriers (APCs).

This is another example of militarism at home to add to the long list, as its ethics and methods continue to extend into our civilian law enforcement and justice systems. Griffith – as perhaps a soldier does – is proposing military solutions to political problems, suggesting military action is now the inescapable option to issues of crime.

This political leadership impacts news coverage. The language, myths, behaviours and concepts of the military become adopted by the media, which in turn normalises and increases public acceptance of the idea of war.

In the political sphere war is deployed in civilian contexts. There’s the war on terror, the war on drugs, the war on poverty and in a television interview on May 14th the National Security Minister described the country’s fight against crime and criminal activity as another “war”.

All are unwinnable wars of course because they are wars waged with no concrete enemy to defeat, only ideas and social problems, often with many civilian casualties. Is fighting an unwinnable war, endlessly, really what the Minister is proposing for T&T?

Listen to Minster Griffith’s words and its clear he has drunk the militarism kool aid. “The plan is to fight fire with fire and go into the ultimate hotspot areas and take the fight back to the so-called gang leaders who actually have the impression that certain areas and communities belong to them…We will be going in very hard with clinical precision with a special operation group” Griffith said.

This raises many questions; such as does he really think crime and violence in T&T has no connection to elites and white-collar. And worryingly what is the Minister exit strategy from this war?

The Minister speaks about providing the right equipment to tackle out of control crime and violence, the right military toys to take on the criminals. Yet in terms of weapons and personal the state has always outnumbered and outgunned the criminals.

As most non-kool aid drinkers up and down the country point out, it is not better weapons and hardware we need. It is better intelligence and detection rates, less corruption, an improved justice system and something less dangerous to us all – now and in the long run – than militarism. These are issues requiring social and political solutions, not Captain T&T, military toys, and an endless war. 

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed