Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

A Social Mamagism Index 

12/4/2014

0 Comments

 
How measurement indices are used to erase historical and structural inequalities...
Picture
The superstars of measurement have spoken. And while you might never have imagined there were such persons, what they say about social progress influences development thinking around the world.

The recently released Social Progress Index (SPI) is the brainchild of Republican and Harvard Economist Michael E. Porter and MIT’s Scott Stern. Its neoliberal credentials and worldview are clear in the glossy blurb put out by their Washington-DC based parent organisation, the Social Progress Imperative, and in their financial supporters, which include well-known institutions of neoliberal faith like the Rockefeller Foundation.

So what does the SPI do? In simple terms it measures and ranks 132 of the world’s nations into a hierarchy around the ill-defined notion of “Social Progress” (T&T comes in at number 47).

In order to quantify social progress the index measured 54 variables in three dimensions each with various sub-components and indicators. These are 1) Basic Human Needs; 2) Foundations of Wellbeing; and 3) Opportunity. T&T’s rank across each of these three dimensions was 64th, 53rd and 31st respectively.

Such indices provide Governments with ways to compare themselves to other countries. It allows them to measure the success of various programs and supposedly provides them with tools to improve equity for their populations. The authors themselves claim Governments, the business community and economists will be able to analyse a country’s wellbeing independently of economic variables.

Much kudos has been lavished on the SPI by Western mainstream media. Yet a voice of caution is needed from those nations not sat at the head table of global economic policy. Yes of course measurement and progress are important. Not to mention that GDP alone as a measure is a pretty unsophisticated way to determine the health of a nation.

Yet while we might agree that economic growth alone is insufficient to guide a country’s equitable development there is a hidden power at work in the SPI determining common-sense around how to view the world.

Looking at the SPI league table from the Caribbean it’s clear the top 34 nations deemed to be the world’s most socially progressive are white majority nations. While the bottom 36 positions are all, excluding Iraq, majority black and brown nations.

So clearly one thing the index and its fancy measuring categories do is erase discussion on the “the positional difference” or structural racism between nations, and the structural inequalities set up by slavery, colonialism and imperialism.

This obscures the constitution of nations and important issues of justice-denied, such as exploitation, marginalisation, powerlessness, cultural imperialism and violence that oppressed some nations and underdeveloped their progress.

Or put another way. When you disconnect social progress from history, and design a methodology that ignores a nation’s historical and relative access to capital and wealth, it becomes possible to mamaguy politicians of the world and their citizens with false praise about their various scores across 54 social progress indices. At the same time this diminishes acknowledgment of the role racial oppression played/plays between nations at top and bottom of the table.

Which leaves the question, if white majority nations of the West who design ethno-centric metrics are allowed to erase structural legacies what about those metrics non-white nations outside the top 34 might want measured?

Where are the measurements about Small Island nations forced into economic disaster by the structural adjustment policies and economic hit men of the IMF, WTO and World Bank? Where are the measurements about the legacies of how much wealth, labour and resources were stolen from ex-colonies? Where are the measurements about insecurity and oppressive surveillance due to the US War on Terror? Where are the measurements about bankers and banks prosecuted for the 2008 Global Financial Crisis?

The hidden power in all of this is suggestive. We glimpse how top-down power functions and shapes how we view the world. The SPI downplays wealth when most accept access to wealth determined and determines, in large part, both individual and national levels of social progress.

Hidden power sets the agenda of what is sayable, what is on the table and open for discussion. In this sense, there must be a caution the SPI is a Trojan horse inside 21st century common sense carrying the implicit assumption that economic, and specifically structural inequalities should no longer be the main focus of Government concern. And new composite indices of social progress as defined by the powerful Western nations are considered most useful for Governments of the world.

Behind a smokescreen of measurement and mamagism the historic and structural inequalities of race and class oppression are made to vanish never to be spoken of seriously again. In who’s interest is that?

http://www.guardian.co.tt/columnist/2014-04-13/social-mamagism-index

 

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed