Dylan Kerrigan
  • Home
  • About
  • Academic Writings
    • Consultancy Summaries
  • Books
  • Opeds/Blogs
  • Other Writings
  • Teaching
    • Graduate Supervision
  • Therapeutic Cultures
  • In the Press
  • Presentations
  • Videos
  • Research
    • Data Visualisations
    • Past
    • Current
    • Future
  • Blog

Engineering social change

8/12/2013

0 Comments

 
What might be done to improve the human condition for all?
Picture
What might be done to improve the human condition for all? Over the last 50 years, relying on the advice of ordained “experts”, such as political and social scientists, ministers and politicians, and a sprinkling of well and not so well intentioned foreign others, we’ve been encouraged to trust State-led “social engineering” as the answer.

Supposedly in its various forms and schemes this type of engineering would improve society: tackle crime and violence, reduce family sizes, end the drug trade, produce minds of the future, provide “developed” nation status by 2020, bring prosperity for all, and more.

The only problem is such social problems were not fixed and solved. If anything, social disasters like economic inequality and poverty got worse. One way to imagine failures of State-led social change might be to say the State itself is part of the problem.

One reason behind the failures of successive Government-led social change projects is the “magic jellybeans” school of thought those who make the decisions find most seductive. Instead of a magic beanstalk they put their faith in the alchemy of science, including social science, the most magical of sciences.

This dream world is exempt from the irrational and daily realities of family, work, play and survival. Instead, rational thinking and planning by technical experts in specialist language that excludes most people from the conversation – what Norman Girvan calls the “technification of language” – devise one stop plans for social change.

Let’s take GATE. Who would argue against a State pursuing Western tertiary education as a way to improve the human condition? In this social engineering experiment success is entirely possible; no one would say free education is a completely crazy idea. Yet what seems simple and singular from the outside, free tertiary education, is actually a vast and complex system.

At the UWI for example, the undergraduate student to supervisor ratio has exploded to unmanageable proportions, the same if not worse with Graduate supervision. The infrastructure in terms of books, classrooms, facilities, educators, and oversight cannot cope with the large mid-2000s increase in student numbers.

Of course, as with everywhere in Trinidad, visible evidence is seen daily in painful traffic jams to leave campus. More worrying evidence is the gap between graduates produced and jobs available, which festers in wider society with long-term implications no politician is sure of.

So while we can agree with technocrats that education is important for the future, social engineering is never a simple fix. Even the most well-intentioned and educated professional can produce social calamities, because technocrats often fail to see the larger, system-wide effects of particular and singular interventions.

Another example of State led hubris can be seen in the energy sector. Like any State that cares about economic development T&T is committed to the exploitation of our natural resources.

In order to enhance this exploitation the State is allowing energy companies searching for oil and hydrocarbons in the seabed to deploy air guns, which release intense pulses of compressed air into the water. These pulses according to the US-based Natural Resources Defence Council can cause fish stocks to plummet over enormous areas of ocean.

On the surface the technocrats and those with the magic jellybeans consider this deep-sea search to be of minor proportions, clear and easily managed, understood by the “experts”. Yet the politicians in charge cannot completely anticipate the complex systems they are intervening into and the potential outcomes.

And here we might say State driven, “expert” led projects to engineer nations often create more problems than they solve because we know far less than we think we do, and our predications are often more fairy tales than fact.

A Government might understand the value of finding more oil and gas but they cannot foresee the interconnected environmental and social effects the failure of fish to spawn, others to migrate, organ damage to others, and endangerment of the food supply will lead to.

According to the anthropologist James C. Scott these sorts of realities mean we need to rethink State development and “centrally planned, social engineering projects”.

For example, they should take small steps rather than be grand visions. Be localised. Favour reversibility and interventions that can be undone. Build consensus. Recruit practical local knowledge alongside academic science, and in equal measure plan for surprises, failure, and human inventiveness.

This is all simplistic of course – and we haven’t even mentioned biases or vested interests yet – but its still easy to see why, locally and internationally, certain State led schemes to improve the human condition have and will continue to fail.

http://www.guardian.co.tt/columnist/2013-12-08/gifts-and-bribes

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Amerindian
    Bias
    Capitalism
    Carnival
    Census
    Change
    Charlotteville
    Christmas
    Cipriani
    Citizenship
    Class
    Clico
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Community
    Conspiracy
    Corruption
    Crime
    Critical Thinking
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Logic
    Cultural Myth
    Culture
    Degradation
    Development
    Differences
    Disabilities
    Discourse
    Discrimination
    Diversity
    Division
    Drugs
    Economic
    Economics
    Economy
    Education
    Emancipation
    Emigration
    Employment
    Environment
    Equality
    Ethnicity
    Ethnocentrism
    Ethnology
    Family
    Gang
    Gender
    Governance
    Government
    Grenada
    Hcu
    History
    Homophobia
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Inequality
    Institutions
    Intellectualism
    Justice
    Language
    Legislation
    Marriage
    Mas
    Militarism
    Military
    Morality
    Multiculturalism
    National Security
    Nepotism
    Opportunity
    Patriarchy
    Policy
    Politics
    Poverty
    Power
    Precolonial
    Prejudice
    Prisons
    Privatisation
    Privilege
    Progress
    Propaganda
    Prostitution
    Race
    Reflexivity
    Relationships
    Religion
    Rights
    Science
    Security
    Segregation
    Sexism
    Sexuality
    Sex Work
    Slavery
    (small-goal) Football
    Social Media
    Soe
    Solidarity
    Speed
    State
    Status
    Success
    Taboo
    Teaching
    Technology
    Tobago
    Tourism
    Trade
    Transparency
    University
    Violence
    War
    White Collar
    White-collar

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    November 2017
    October 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed